May 3, 2012
In 2011, #Nestlé was listed No. 1 in the Fortune Global 500 as the world’s most profitable corporation.

mymanatee:

According to “Bottled Life” (2012), nestle is able to buy a truckload of water in the US for $10. It then sells it for $50,000. Here’s some other things i’ve learned about nestle today:

  • At the 2005 world economic forum, nestle received 29% of the vote for “world’s least responsible company”, twice as many as the next on the list, GMO biotech giant, monsanto.
     
  • They are essentially denying impoverished third world nations their own water supply. In order for nations like Nigeria to receive financial aid from the IMF, they must first agree to privatize their water supply. This allows for corporations like nestle to exploit their water supplies, by pretty much coming in, taking control of it, and then selling it back to them at a ridiculously high price (remember the $10 truckload sold for $50,000?). nestle has absolutely NO compassion in it’s dealings with this planet, yet it is the most profitable corporation on it.
     
  • They don’t care about your health. nestle boasts itself as “the world’s largest nutrition, health, and wellness company”, but takes absolutely no responsibility for promoting unhealthy and genetically modified foods as nutritionally beneficial.
  • They are inherently evil and must be destroyed! (peacefully)

Read More

(via mymanatee)

March 6, 2012
reagan-was-a-horrible-president:

solitaryforager:
Private Prison Corporation Offers Cash In Exchange For State Prisons
As state governments wrestle with massive budget shortfalls, a Wall Street giant is offering a solution: cash in exchange for state property. Prisons, to be exact.
Corrections Corporation of America, the nation’s largest operator of for-profit prisons, has sent letters recently to 48 states offering to buy up their prisons as a remedy for “challenging corrections budgets.” In exchange, the company is asking for a 20-year management contract, plus an assurance that the prison would remain at least 90 percent full, according to a copy of the letter obtained by The Huffington Post.
The move reflects a significant shift in strategy for the private prison industry, which until now has expanded by building prisons of its own or managing state-controlled prisons. It also represents an unprecedented bid for more control of state prison systems.
Corrections Corporation has been a swiftly growing business, with revenues expanding more than fivefold since the mid-1990s. The company capitalized on the expansion of state prison systems in the ’80s and ’90s at the height of the so-called ‘war on drugs,’ contracting with state governments to build or manage new prisons to house an influx of drug offenders. During the past 10 years, it has found new opportunity in the business of locking up undocumented immigrants, as the federal government has contracted with private companies in an aggressive immigrant-detention campaign.

Did y’all catch that?
“plus an assurance that the prison would remain at least 90 percent full”

reagan-was-a-horrible-president:

solitaryforager:

Private Prison Corporation Offers Cash In Exchange For State Prisons

As state governments wrestle with massive budget shortfalls, a Wall Street giant is offering a solution: cash in exchange for state property. Prisons, to be exact.

Corrections Corporation of America, the nation’s largest operator of for-profit prisons, has sent letters recently to 48 states offering to buy up their prisons as a remedy for “challenging corrections budgets.” In exchange, the company is asking for a 20-year management contract, plus an assurance that the prison would remain at least 90 percent full, according to a copy of the letter obtained by The Huffington Post.

The move reflects a significant shift in strategy for the private prison industry, which until now has expanded by building prisons of its own or managing state-controlled prisons. It also represents an unprecedented bid for more control of state prison systems.

Corrections Corporation has been a swiftly growing business, with revenues expanding more than fivefold since the mid-1990s. The company capitalized on the expansion of state prison systems in the ’80s and ’90s at the height of the so-called ‘war on drugs,’ contracting with state governments to build or manage new prisons to house an influx of drug offenders. During the past 10 years, it has found new opportunity in the business of locking up undocumented immigrants, as the federal government has contracted with private companies in an aggressive immigrant-detention campaign.

Did y’all catch that?

“plus an assurance that the prison would remain at least 90 percent full”


(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

February 24, 2012
Corporations Don’t Need a Tax Cut, So Why Is Obama Proposing One?

kateoplis:

The Obama administration is proposing to lower corporate taxes from the current 35 percent to 28 percent for most companies and to 25 percent for manufacturers.

The move is supposed to be “revenue neutral” – meaning the Administration is also proposing to close assorted corporate tax loopholes to offset the lost revenues. One such loophole allows corporations to park their earnings overseas where taxes are lower. Why isn’t the White House just proposing to close the loopholes without reducing overall corporate tax rates? That would generate more tax revenue that could be used for, say, public schools.

It’s not as if corporations are hurting. Quite the contrary. American companies are booking higher profits than ever. They’re sitting on $2 trillion of cash they don’t know what to do with. And it’s not as if corporate taxes are high. In fact, corporate tax receipts as a share of profits is now at its lowest level in at least 40 years. According to the Congressional Budget Office, corporate federal taxes paid last year dropped to 12.1 percent of profits earned from activities within the United States. That’s a gigantic drop from the 25.6 percent, on average, that corporations paid from 1987 to 2008.

And it’s not that corporations are paying an inordinate share of federal tax revenues. Here again, the reality is just the opposite. Corporate taxes have plummeted as a share of total federal revenues. In 1953, under President Dwight Eisenhower, a Republican, corporate taxes accounted for 32 percent of total federal tax revenues. Now they’re only 10 percent. […]

The Administration’s initiative doesn’t even make sense as a bargaining maneuver.”

Robert Reich

February 19, 2012
nrdc:

These shrimp without eyes were caught off the Gulf Coast in late 2011.

BP Hauls in $7.7 Billion in Profits, Gulf Fishermen Haul in Shrimp with No Eyes

Oil giant BP, the company behind the Deepwater Horizon oil spill,  reported profits of $7.7 billion for the last quarter of 2011. Company  executives and industry analysts sounded bullish about the company’s  future in a recent New York Times article,  saying they had set aside enough money to compensate victims of the  Gulf spill and had plans to expand drilling operations in the Gulf.

BP seems to be recovering nicely after the disaster, which killed 11  people and pumped 170 million gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.  But stories from the Gulf suggest that the region is anything but  healed.

The Gulf has been plagued with a suite of unexplained afflictions.  Gulf fishermen say this is the worst season they can remember, with  catches down 80 percent or more. Shrimp boats come home nearly empty, hauling in deformed, discolored shrimp, even shrimp without eyes. Tar balls and dead dolphins still wash up on beaches. Scientists report huge tar mats below the sand, “like vanilla swirl ice cream.” Read more in NRDC’s Switchboard blog.

nrdc:

These shrimp without eyes were caught off the Gulf Coast in late 2011.

BP Hauls in $7.7 Billion in Profits, Gulf Fishermen Haul in Shrimp with No Eyes

Oil giant BP, the company behind the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, reported profits of $7.7 billion for the last quarter of 2011. Company executives and industry analysts sounded bullish about the company’s future in a recent New York Times article, saying they had set aside enough money to compensate victims of the Gulf spill and had plans to expand drilling operations in the Gulf.

BP seems to be recovering nicely after the disaster, which killed 11 people and pumped 170 million gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. But stories from the Gulf suggest that the region is anything but healed.

The Gulf has been plagued with a suite of unexplained afflictions. Gulf fishermen say this is the worst season they can remember, with catches down 80 percent or more. Shrimp boats come home nearly empty, hauling in deformed, discolored shrimp, even shrimp without eyes. Tar balls and dead dolphins still wash up on beaches. Scientists report huge tar mats below the sand, “like vanilla swirl ice cream.” Read more in NRDC’s Switchboard blog.

(via localyolk)

February 19, 2012
Two Supreme Court Justices Suggest Reconsidering 'Citizens United' Ruling

liberalsarecool:

Two Supreme Court justices suggested Friday that the court reconsider its controversial 2010 decision that allowed unlimited corporate and union spending in elections.

The suggestion came as the court blocked a Montana Supreme Court decision upholding a century-old ban on corporate campaign spending in the state.The Montana ruling seems squarely at odds with the court’s 5 to 4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which allowed unlimited corporate spending. The U.S. Supreme Court majority had said such independent spending did not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption.

In Friday’s order, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer said the upheaval in the world of campaign finance since the Citizens United decision does not bear out the majority opinion.

“Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, make it exceedingly difficult to maintain that independent expenditures by corporations ‘do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption,’ ” Ginsburg wrote.

(Source: Washington Post)

(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

February 17, 2012

(Source: anukkinearthwalker, via jmek)

January 17, 2012
Craigslist, Comcast, and Capitalism

squashed:

I’m moving—which means I’m doing a bit more buying and selling than usual. Some of this involves selling large objects on craigslist. Like most craigslist transactions, it’s pretty straightforward. Something is listed at a price. Maybe some negotiation occurs. Sale commences or doesn’t. Everybody is happy and nobody is cheated.1

I’m also doing things like talking to ISPs and moving companies. The larger the company, the more convoluted their pricing structure. Comcast will offer a cable subscription for a six month introductory rate. Except after that time, it jumps to some other rate that you need to read a lot of fine print to learn. And then you have to either lease a modem from them or buy it—which is free after a rebate that comes in the form of a prepaid debit card that needs to be used in a specific manner and contains other as-yet-unknown restrictions. And, of course, there are doubtlessly additional fees tacked onto the bill for things that I’m sure I could learn about if I read pages and pages of boilerplate that nobody has actually shown me.2

If all of capitalism functioned like craigslist, we wouldn’t need something like a consumer financial protection bureau. If corporations are intent on obfuscating the cost of their products, we should expect consumers to be confused. We expect the “willing transaction” element of capitalism to break down. We need regulators to keep the playing field level.


  1. Excluding the obvious scams. So long as nobody actually sends money via Western Union to the guy who claims he’s on vacation but has a pickup agent two hundred miles away who is totally going to come by and pick up that toaster, everybody is happy and nobody is cheated. 

  2. Somebody will respond to this post with something to the effect of, “Stop whining just because you’re a sucker. It’s you responsibility to read all of these contracts and manage your finances and when I was your age I pulled myself up by my bootstraps because kids these days are all a bunch of lazy whiners.” In my case, working out the math or reading and understanding the fine print isn’t a problem. (Consumer attorney. Math major.) I come out okay. That said, understanding the basic costs of 

December 28, 2011
The energy driving OWS movement comes from deep within the collective soul of a new generation of young Americans who have been disenfranchised by clueless politicians who are trapped deep inside a corrupt two-party political system no longer capable of changing. And our youth are enraged.

wilwheaton:

“This primal cry for democracy sprang from young people who could no longer ignore the angst in their gut — the premonition that their future does not compute, that their entire lives will be lived in the apocalyptic shadow of climate-change tipping points, species die-offs, a deadening commercialized culture, a political system perverted by money, precarious employment, a struggle to pay off crippling student loans, and no chance of ever owning a home or living in comfort like their parents. Glimpsing this black hole of ecological, political, financial and spiritual crisis, the youth and the millions of Americans who joined them instinctively knew that unless they stood up and fought nonviolently for a different kind of future, they would have no future at all.”

Yes, America’s youth are the voice of the 99%, Americans inspired by the Arab Spring revolutions. American youth are fueling “the greatest social-justice movement to emerge in the United States since the civil rights era.”

“This kind of military mindset and violent response to nonviolent protesters makes no sense. It did not work in the Middle East, and it’s not going to work in America either. This is the bottom line … you cannot attack your young and get away with it.”

Repeat that “bottom line … you cannot attack your young and get away with it.” And yet, that’s exactly what Wall Street, America’s superrich, their lobbyists and all their bought politicians are doing: “attacking our young.” Attacking our next generation. Attacking America’s future.

(via hyper426)

December 27, 2011
The Weight of Walmart

December 26, 2011
rantsandplants:

Amazing article by Bruce Bradley reflecting on this year and Big Food. 

As the holidays rapidly approach, like many others, I find myself  looking back over the past year. While on the personal front this past  year has been amazing, there hasn’t been much to celebrate in the world  of food. But rather than create yet another top ten list, I’ve opted for  a holiday-themed option I’m calling Big Food’s Twelve Days of Christmas. To help explain the meaning behind the lyrics, here’s a quick primer:
12 Lobbyists lobbying: I never realized how “evil” the food lobby could be until a couple years ago when I watched this 60 Minutes episode called “Meet Dr. Evil.” This  year we saw the food lobby in action on many fronts, but one of their  ugliest fights was aimed at killing voluntary guidelines for kid  advertising. As Reuters reported,  “The loss of ads have worried companies such as Coca-Cola Co, which has  spent $4.74 million to lobby so far this year, Kraft Food Inc, which  has spent $2.09 million; and PepsiCo Inc, which has spent $2.61 million,  among others.” Big Food has won the first several rounds of this fight,  but I continue to ask the simple question:  Why do food companies’  right to market unhealthy products to children trump our right to raise  healthy kids who aren’t exposed to junk food marketing? It seems like  profits are prioritized over our kids, doesn’t it? If you want to learn  more about this battle, check out my post entitled “Marketing to Kids: Collateral Damage in Big Food’s Profit Hunt.”
11 Admen a-lying: Do you believe everything you hear? I hope not! And that’s especially  true when you listen to food advertising. Check out several of the ad  efforts I’ve critiqued where junk food is equated with happiness, McDonald’s bastardizes the Olympics, and Truvia claims it’s “Honestly Sweet.”
10 Lawmakers ag-gagging: Big Food doesn’t like it when the truth is exposed. So what does it do?  It tries to make it illegal for whistleblowers to catch them in the  act. Thankfully these attempts failed, but to learn more about what Big  Food tried to do, check out Mark Bittman’s article in the New York Times  entitled, “Who Protects the Animals?”
9 Geneticists altering: If you live in the United States, did you know your processed food is  full of genetically modified ingredients? It’s one of the many labeling  secrets Big Food has been able to accomplish despite the questions over the safety of GMOs and the fact that many foreign countries require GMO labeling. But Big Food is never satisfied with the status quo, and 2011 brought GMO alfalfa into the United States’ food supply. Sounds like US consumers are “winning” just about as much as Charlie Sheen.
8  Chicken farms abusing: After recalling more than 500 million eggs last year due to salmonella, the egg industry took several more hits in 2011, including an accusation that one of the biggest, US egg producers (Sparboe Farms) has been cruel to its chickens. The situation was so bad that even McDonald’s dumped the supplier of  its Egg McMuffin eggs. But tell me…if the food we eat is so safe and  raised so humanely, why do we see these problems come up year after  year? Why should we trust Big Food?
7 Cereals sugar-bombing: After working in the cereal business I knew that many cereals were  little-more than sugar-laden bowls of dessert in disguise. In my blog I compared Frosted Flakes to Skinny Cow ice cream sandwiches. The Environmental Working Group also took the cereal industry to task, and made some revealing comparisons to snack cakes and cookies.
6 Scientists flavoring: After revealing my bout with soda addiction,  I shared how Big Food and Beverage companies work with flavor companies  to make our food addictive. If you haven’t seen the 60 minutes  interview with Givaudan’s flavor scientists, you must check it out here.
5 Happy Meals: McDonald’s announced a healthier Happy Meal that now automatically includes a smaller portion of fries and a  serving of apples. While McDonald’s move is certainly an improvement, it  hardly equates to a healthy meal. As noted obesity expert Yoni Freedhoff points out, “We’re not going to “solve” childhood obesity with  healthier Happy Meals. Giving parents more reason to go may well  backfire.  We need to cook.”
4. “Fruit” Snacks: After reporting on the deceptive practices of fruit snack manufacturers in “Fruit Snacks … Real Fruit or Just Candy in Disguise?” back in July 2011, it was interesting to learn about a class action complaint filed against General Mills in October for deceptive advertising. Undeterred, General Mills  defended its lineup of sugary snacks and said, “We stand behind our  products and we stand behind the accuracy of the labeling of those  products.” Once again Big Food confirms that it’s more interested in  selling food than accurately portraying its products.
3 Recalled Burgers: The ongoing saga of ground beef recalls continued in 2011 with 60,000 pounds recalled in August, 131,000 pounds in September, and another 40,000 pounds recalled last week,  just to name a few. Rather than address the underlying issues  exacerbated by industrial farming, Big Food continues to play Russian  roulette with consumers’ lives in the name of profits.
2 Tainted Turkeys: Unfortunately this recall was much more than two tainted turkeys. In August, Cargill announced the recall of almost 36 million pounds of ground turkey contaminated with a multi-drug-resistant strain of salmonella. Again I  ask, if our food is so safe, why are we consistently having such huge  recalls? Not only are these extremely dangerous to public health, but  they are also an incredible waste of natural resources.
And a pizza as a vegetable: If there ever was a clearer sign that Big Food controls Congress, it’s got to be the battle over pizza in school lunches. As Michele Simon points out in her assessment of this latest installment of food politics,  “the critical (and most under-reported) part of this story is how  Congress has hijacked the USDA regulatory process to do the food  industry’s bidding.” Thanks to food industry-funded lobbyist groups like  the American Frozen Food Institute and The Coalition for Sustainable  Meal Programs, our children’s health has fallen victim (once again) to  corporate profits.

rantsandplants:

Amazing article by Bruce Bradley reflecting on this year and Big Food. 

As the holidays rapidly approach, like many others, I find myself looking back over the past year. While on the personal front this past year has been amazing, there hasn’t been much to celebrate in the world of food. But rather than create yet another top ten list, I’ve opted for a holiday-themed option I’m calling Big Food’s Twelve Days of Christmas. To help explain the meaning behind the lyrics, here’s a quick primer:

12 Lobbyists lobbying: I never realized how “evil” the food lobby could be until a couple years ago when I watched this 60 Minutes episode called “Meet Dr. Evil.” This year we saw the food lobby in action on many fronts, but one of their ugliest fights was aimed at killing voluntary guidelines for kid advertising. As Reuters reported, “The loss of ads have worried companies such as Coca-Cola Co, which has spent $4.74 million to lobby so far this year, Kraft Food Inc, which has spent $2.09 million; and PepsiCo Inc, which has spent $2.61 million, among others.” Big Food has won the first several rounds of this fight, but I continue to ask the simple question:  Why do food companies’ right to market unhealthy products to children trump our right to raise healthy kids who aren’t exposed to junk food marketing? It seems like profits are prioritized over our kids, doesn’t it? If you want to learn more about this battle, check out my post entitled “Marketing to Kids: Collateral Damage in Big Food’s Profit Hunt.”

11 Admen a-lying: Do you believe everything you hear? I hope not! And that’s especially true when you listen to food advertising. Check out several of the ad efforts I’ve critiqued where junk food is equated with happiness, McDonald’s bastardizes the Olympics, and Truvia claims it’s “Honestly Sweet.”

10 Lawmakers ag-gagging: Big Food doesn’t like it when the truth is exposed. So what does it do? It tries to make it illegal for whistleblowers to catch them in the act. Thankfully these attempts failed, but to learn more about what Big Food tried to do, check out Mark Bittman’s article in the New York Times entitled, “Who Protects the Animals?”

9 Geneticists altering: If you live in the United States, did you know your processed food is full of genetically modified ingredients? It’s one of the many labeling secrets Big Food has been able to accomplish despite the questions over the safety of GMOs and the fact that many foreign countries require GMO labeling. But Big Food is never satisfied with the status quo, and 2011 brought GMO alfalfa into the United States’ food supply. Sounds like US consumers are “winning” just about as much as Charlie Sheen.

8  Chicken farms abusing: After recalling more than 500 million eggs last year due to salmonella, the egg industry took several more hits in 2011, including an accusation that one of the biggest, US egg producers (Sparboe Farms) has been cruel to its chickens. The situation was so bad that even McDonald’s dumped the supplier of its Egg McMuffin eggs. But tell me…if the food we eat is so safe and raised so humanely, why do we see these problems come up year after year? Why should we trust Big Food?

7 Cereals sugar-bombing: After working in the cereal business I knew that many cereals were little-more than sugar-laden bowls of dessert in disguise. In my blog I compared Frosted Flakes to Skinny Cow ice cream sandwiches. The Environmental Working Group also took the cereal industry to task, and made some revealing comparisons to snack cakes and cookies.

6 Scientists flavoring: After revealing my bout with soda addiction, I shared how Big Food and Beverage companies work with flavor companies to make our food addictive. If you haven’t seen the 60 minutes interview with Givaudan’s flavor scientists, you must check it out here.

5 Happy Meals: McDonald’s announced a healthier Happy Meal that now automatically includes a smaller portion of fries and a serving of apples. While McDonald’s move is certainly an improvement, it hardly equates to a healthy meal. As noted obesity expert Yoni Freedhoff points out, “We’re not going to “solve” childhood obesity with healthier Happy Meals. Giving parents more reason to go may well backfire.  We need to cook.”

4. “Fruit” Snacks: After reporting on the deceptive practices of fruit snack manufacturers in “Fruit Snacks … Real Fruit or Just Candy in Disguise?” back in July 2011, it was interesting to learn about a class action complaint filed against General Mills in October for deceptive advertising. Undeterred, General Mills defended its lineup of sugary snacks and said, “We stand behind our products and we stand behind the accuracy of the labeling of those products.” Once again Big Food confirms that it’s more interested in selling food than accurately portraying its products.

3 Recalled Burgers: The ongoing saga of ground beef recalls continued in 2011 with 60,000 pounds recalled in August, 131,000 pounds in September, and another 40,000 pounds recalled last week, just to name a few. Rather than address the underlying issues exacerbated by industrial farming, Big Food continues to play Russian roulette with consumers’ lives in the name of profits.

2 Tainted Turkeys: Unfortunately this recall was much more than two tainted turkeys. In August, Cargill announced the recall of almost 36 million pounds of ground turkey contaminated with a multi-drug-resistant strain of salmonella. Again I ask, if our food is so safe, why are we consistently having such huge recalls? Not only are these extremely dangerous to public health, but they are also an incredible waste of natural resources.

And a pizza as a vegetable: If there ever was a clearer sign that Big Food controls Congress, it’s got to be the battle over pizza in school lunches. As Michele Simon points out in her assessment of this latest installment of food politics, “the critical (and most under-reported) part of this story is how Congress has hijacked the USDA regulatory process to do the food industry’s bidding.” Thanks to food industry-funded lobbyist groups like the American Frozen Food Institute and The Coalition for Sustainable Meal Programs, our children’s health has fallen victim (once again) to corporate profits.

(Source: beetsshootsleaves, via impulsivefarmer)

December 22, 2011
"Ninety-three percent of soybeans and 80 percent of corn grown in the United States are under the control of just one company. Four companies control up to 90 percent of the global trade in grain. Today, three companies process more than 70 percent of beef in the U.S"

Occupy the food system.  We are the 99%, and we’re being controlled to eat genetically modified, unsustainably produced, chemically dependent food.

(Source: chiefsareninjasinkhakis, via impulsivefarmer)

December 11, 2011

stfuconservatives:

glitchthemachine:

BERNIE SANDERS IS GOING TO OVERTURN CITIZENS UNITED BUT HE NEEDS OUR HELP!

OK people. HERE WE GO REBLOG THIS EVERYWHERE! THIS IS IMPORTANT!

BERNIE SANDERS NOW INTRODUCING The Saving American Democracy Amendment which states that:

  • Corporations are not persons with constitutional rights equal to real people.
  • Corporations are subject to regulation by the people.
  • Corporations may not make campaign contributions.
  • Congress and states have the power to regulate campaign finances.

SIGN THE PETITION NOW TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT!!!!

If you believe that the voice of a billionaire shouldn’t be more important than yours then spread this and sign the petition.

If you believe that this should be a government of the people rather than of the corporations then spread this and sign the petition.

If you believe in democracy then spread this and sign the petition.

-Joe

(via impulsivefarmer)

December 8, 2011
Unanimous Vote: No more corporate personhood in LA

November 21, 2011
The US is Now a Corporate Monarchy

I wonder: Why have the Europeans figured out they are getting screwed, and we haven’t? Why are they taking to the streets en masse, while we seem to be watching our own control over our own futures slip from our hands almost as if from afar?

In America, we are too busy dropping the kids off at soccer, running around looking for sales and bargains, racing to keep our heads above water. We seem to forget to get outraged. Our control over our once Democracy — the one we had a revolution against a monarchy dictating decisions from afar — slips away from us. Not with a bang, not even with a whimper, but with a 1000s acts of gradual ceding of power to the new Monarch. We have given up hard won rights to a coordinated attack from all three branches of government; Our Congress has become the legislative branch of eBay — Congressmen are auctioned off to the highest bidder; they even have a Buy It Now button to get specific legislation passed. The executive branch has fallen under the sunk cost fallacy, afraid to prosecute banks because we spent so many billions bailing them out. It turns out that even our once venerable Supreme Court is just as corrupted, with lobbyists partying with Justices and backdooring ethics by hiring their wives.

In short, our new overlords are enormously well funded, well connected, relentless and perhaps most of all, patient. This new King was not appointed by primogeniture, or even Divine Right, but by acquiring enough profits in the free market that they can buy control over society, even as they thwart that free market ideal for their own ends. We have become, in short, a Corporate Monarchy.

The right question isn’t why am I angry, sad and outraged. The proper question is, why aren’t you?

October 20, 2011
curiositycounts:

Decades-old Calvin and Hobbes comic strip succinctly explains the Occupy Wall Street movement   (via)

DECADES OLD.

curiositycounts:

Decades-old Calvin and Hobbes comic strip succinctly explains the Occupy Wall Street movement   (via)

DECADES OLD.

(via anxiaostudio)

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »